<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comentarios en: Marketing Content Hosted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ojobuscador.com/noticias/marketing-content-hosted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ojobuscador.com/noticias/marketing-content-hosted/</link>
	<description>hoy OJO mira los buscadores ... mañana los buscadores mirarán OJO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:31:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Por: Juan Manuel</title>
		<link>http://www.ojobuscador.com/noticias/marketing-content-hosted/comment-page-1/#comment-23860</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan Manuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojobuscador.com/2006/10/30/marketing-content-hosted/#comment-23860</guid>
		<description>Con respecto a los propietarios de dominios, con &quot;Privacy protect&quot; esto estaria salvado no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Con respecto a los propietarios de dominios, con &#8220;Privacy protect&#8221; esto estaria salvado no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Por: Mejora tu SEO (especial): Presell Pages</title>
		<link>http://www.ojobuscador.com/noticias/marketing-content-hosted/comment-page-1/#comment-18528</link>
		<dc:creator>Mejora tu SEO (especial): Presell Pages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 08:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojobuscador.com/2006/10/30/marketing-content-hosted/#comment-18528</guid>
		<description>[...] cambio, desde hace un tiempo (he llegado a ver sitios en USA con fecha a Abril de 2005), y creo que no va a tardar mucho en [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] cambio, desde hace un tiempo (he llegado a ver sitios en USA con fecha a Abril de 2005), y creo que no va a tardar mucho en [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Por: Tomy Lorsch</title>
		<link>http://www.ojobuscador.com/noticias/marketing-content-hosted/comment-page-1/#comment-11605</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomy Lorsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojobuscador.com/2006/10/30/marketing-content-hosted/#comment-11605</guid>
		<description>What I was trying to say is: if I want to have more than one page on the Top 10 of google, I prefer your landing pages not to link to my site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I was trying to say is: if I want to have more than one page on the Top 10 of google, I prefer your landing pages not to link to my site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Por: Tomy Lorsch</title>
		<link>http://www.ojobuscador.com/noticias/marketing-content-hosted/comment-page-1/#comment-11604</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomy Lorsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojobuscador.com/2006/10/30/marketing-content-hosted/#comment-11604</guid>
		<description>Well IMHO &quot;the re-ranking component&quot; based on inter-linking does not apply to your service, as one thing is high inter-linking ratio between topic related sites (hub) and other thing is adding results to a Top N which is not well connected with the rest of the topic sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well IMHO &#8220;the re-ranking component&#8221; based on inter-linking does not apply to your service, as one thing is high inter-linking ratio between topic related sites (hub) and other thing is adding results to a Top N which is not well connected with the rest of the topic sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Por: Pre Sell Page Man</title>
		<link>http://www.ojobuscador.com/noticias/marketing-content-hosted/comment-page-1/#comment-11603</link>
		<dc:creator>Pre Sell Page Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojobuscador.com/2006/10/30/marketing-content-hosted/#comment-11603</guid>
		<description>Hi there 

sorry for responding in english but it&#039;s tough enough for me to understand the auto-translated spanish to english :-)

I think you misunderstood Bill&#039;s quote here.
(or I misunderstood you - but the translator said you don&#039;t want other well ranking pages link to you BECAUSE of that patent)

IMHO Your conclusion based on the cited search engine patent should base on the full introduction sentence, and not only Bill&#039;s partial quote which changes the meaning

US patent 6,526,440 from 
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PALL&amp;p=1&amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=6526440.PN.&amp;OS=PN/6526440&amp;RS=PN/6526440
introduction ALSO says

&quot;A re-ranking component in the search engine then refines the initially returned document rankings so that documents that are frequently cited in the initial set of relevant documents are preferred over documents that are less frequently cited within the initial set.
&quot;

This practically means that you DO want your site getting linked from other well ranked pages in the TOP-N results, because that will make it more important...


best regards
presell page man</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there </p>
<p>sorry for responding in english but it&#8217;s tough enough for me to understand the auto-translated spanish to english <img src='http://www.ojobuscador.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I think you misunderstood Bill&#8217;s quote here.<br />
(or I misunderstood you &#8211; but the translator said you don&#8217;t want other well ranking pages link to you BECAUSE of that patent)</p>
<p>IMHO Your conclusion based on the cited search engine patent should base on the full introduction sentence, and not only Bill&#8217;s partial quote which changes the meaning</p>
<p>US patent 6,526,440 from<br />
<a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PALL&amp;p=1&amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=6526440.PN.&amp;OS=PN/6526440&amp;RS=PN/6526440" rel="nofollow">http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PALL&amp;p=1&amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=6526440.PN.&amp;OS=PN/6526440&amp;RS=PN/6526440</a><br />
introduction ALSO says</p>
<p>&#8220;A re-ranking component in the search engine then refines the initially returned document rankings so that documents that are frequently cited in the initial set of relevant documents are preferred over documents that are less frequently cited within the initial set.<br />
&#8221;</p>
<p>This practically means that you DO want your site getting linked from other well ranked pages in the TOP-N results, because that will make it more important&#8230;</p>
<p>best regards<br />
presell page man</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
